What is the Deal on this Birth Certificate
The constitution demands “natural born” so as to mitigate the possibility of “divided loyalties” ***
Anyone can swear and sign the form to the registrar in Hawaii that they were a citizen of Hawaii and within the previous year gave birth. The individual gives the date/time of the birth and a document record is dually entered. Perhaps someone can inform as to whether you even need to show the baby! Doesn’t look like it from my read of the statute.
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0017_0008.htm
One can get a “Certification of Live Birth” with minimal documentation and no eyewitnesses. The date of birth can be any date the person enters! This document can then be used to establish citizenship for the purpose of obtaining a passport, but its lack of physically identifying information found on the "Certification Of Live Birth" precludes it from being useful in proving "Natural Born" status. I guess Obama thinks enough folks are so ignorant that he can get into the Whitehouse before too many find out.
The normal “Birth Certificate” or "Certificate of Live Birth" often but not always contains uniquely identifying information but always has testaments from eyewitness’s (doctor, nurse, orderly) and the specific location so that it is now verifiable and traceable. What Obama’s has displayed in NOT a Birth Certificate, Even if it is real, (there are some forensic experts who say the displayed cert has signs of tampering) it does not provide any kind of traceable proof. This is not the traceable-to-an-individual “Birth Certificate” most any other American would be able to show.
This may well be the biggest fraud ever perpetrated. What is the big deal in showing the real deal Obama? Don't you have one?
No
one is asking for your 1st born,
Just proof as to where you
were born.
Mr. Obama. Take off that
mask.
|
Obama web posted computer generated doc |
This is what everyone is Expecting |
|
|
|
|
SEE The
Difference! The amazing thing is that lacking the real thing, forensic experts
have really dug in and several put forth convincing evidence that even this
worthless document has been tampered with. |
|
|
Note
this dialog regarding the difference in certificates. A
Certification of Live Birth is not a legal document and is explained on this
State of Hawaii Department of Hawaiian Home Lands website. |
|
|
Letter From Hank - A good run down on this key issues- a pithy read
too
I don't wear tin foil hats. I really don't care about the font, or
the word "AFRICAN" instead of the widely-used word of
"NEGRO" or "BLACK" in 1961. The borders make
absolutely no difference, to me. If you peel back the layers, and claim
to find the word "Adobe"
embedded in the electronic document - this means nothing to me.
Frankly, I don't even know what a "halo" around a word is.
The mystery surrounding Barack
Obama's "Live Certificate
of Birth", is in fact no mystery at all. The document is
authentic, and this cannot be disputed.
But Obama is hiding something, and I'll tell you how I know...
After months and months of unrequited requests, the Obama campaign did
finally present a document which they claimed validated his eligibility
(per the Constitution
of the Unted States, Article II, Section I) as a "Natural born
citizen" to have his name on the ballot in contention for the office
of the President of the United States of America.
However, contrary to what the few media outlets who are giving this
outrageous claim any attention at all have concurred, what the Obama
campaign supplied was not, in fact, a "birth
certificate". What they supplied was actually a
"Certificate of Live
Birth." There is a major difference between a
"birth certificate" and a "Certificate of Live Birth."
Aside from the level of detail differentiating the documents (hospital of
record, doctor, height, weight, etc) - in the state of Hawaii, one
authenticates natural born citizenship, and the other doesn't. This
part is important, and again - it has nothing to do with tin foil hats.
Per the State of Hawaii's Department
of Health, "Amended certificates of birth may be prepared and
filed with the Department of Health, as provided by law, for 1) a person
born in Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed with the
Department of Health or 2) a person born in a foreign country."
(For citation purposes, please feel free to visit their site: http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/vital-records/index.html ).
Why is this important? The "Certificate of Live Birth"
provided by Obama, is in fact, a derivative of the "Amended
certificates of birth" they site. Why is that important?
Because per the second clause in the above citation, while you may earn
citizenship via such a document, you do not necessarily earn "natural
born" citizenship. "Natural born citizenship" is what
is required to be eligible to be considered for the Presidency,
per the United
States Constitution.
So where does this leave us? Well for starters, it leaves many of
us....some in tin foil hats, some not....wondering why the Obama campaign
did not supply the definitive, actual, long-form birth certificate.
Contentions are, because one such authentic certificate does not exist.
"That's a pretty distant plea, from the far right, wouldn't you say?
I mean he couldn't have gotten this far without being properly vetted,
right?" That is the assumption that most people are making.
"This isn't possible. You're out of your mind. Get off
the internet." People have made the assumption, but that's all
they've made....the assumption. Fact: Senator
Barack Obama is yet to provide an actual birth certificate to any
governing or other body, validating his eligibility, per the United States
Constitution, to have his name on the ballot as the next, prospective
President of the United States of America.
When the Obama campaign, after several unrequited requests, did finally
submit the "Certificate of Live Birth", in an effort to more
formally properly vet and lend credence to the Senator's run for the
Presidency - which governing body did they submit it to? Was it to
the Board of Elections?
No, not there. Was it to the Federal
Elections Commission? No, not there either. Well then
it must have been to the Democratic
National Committee, right? Wrong again. The Obama
campaign chose as their advocate-for-legitimacy, none other than www.factcheck.org
. Yes, a non-governing, unofficial website. Adding
further mystification and fuel to the "conspiracy whack job"
fire....like it or not, www.factcheck.org
is a product and entity of the Annenberg
Foundation; the very foundation that coupled Barack Obama with Bill
Ayers, and Senator
Obama worked so vigorously to denounce.
"Hey, come on. Now you're just getting too far fetched."
Facts are facts. However, let's get away from the fact that the sole
body the Obama campaign relied on to provide legitimacy to his
"Certificate of Live Birth" was birthed itself, from the very
Foundation that partnered Senator Obama with Bill Ayers. There is
still yet another legitimate question, barring that fact: Why a
website?....
Why not the Board of Elections? Why not the Federal
Election Commission? Why not the Democratic National
Committee? It may very well be because they likely chose not to
draw undue attention to "proof" that they ultimately knew was
accompanied by zero actual credibility. By handing a "Certificate of
Live Birth" over to a true governing body as "proof", the
burden is then on that governing body to put their own credibility on the
line and provide advocacy for that proof. Rather, however, given the
illegitimacy of a "Certificate of Live Birth" as being proof of
anything at all regarding natural born citizenship, they would have been
forced to effectively say, "This means nothing. And now that you've
brought it our attention, and asked for us to put our name on the line as
complicit in validating your 'natural born citizenship', we're going to
need the actual birth certificate. And if you can't provide it,
apologetically, we absolutely can't cite what you've given us as
validation." So what did they do? They sent it to www.factcheck.org,
knowing full well it would be embraced and credited by the allegedly
non-partisan website.
And who stepped up after that and asked questions? No one.
Wait, that's wrong....the "nut job, tin foil-hat-wearing right wing
conspiracy theorists" did.
In August, "nut job, tin foil-hat-wearing right wing conspiracy
theorist", lifetime Democrat, former US District
Attorney General for the State of Pennyslvania, Philip
Berg, challenged Barack Obama in court - seeking to ultimately
compel him to produce an actual birth certificate. After months of
fighting this, and months of expending time, money and resources by the
Obama campaign - the case was ultimately thrown out. "Well if
the case was thrown out, it must mean it was baseless." Wrong
again. The case was thrown out, not unlike the one against Ohio's
SOS, Jennifer Brunner,
due to the standing of the party that brought the case, to do so.
There was no decision on merit. There was no ruling. There was
only the citation that a citizen could not bring the charge. But
still, the question remained, why did the Obama campaign, or rather,
Barack Obama himself - who the case was brought against, not quell the
charge entirely by simply producing an actual, authentic, long-form birth
certificate....thereby validating his eligibility to be complicit with the
United States Constitution, Section II, Article I, prove his natural born
citizenship, and march comfortably through the rest of a fair, tested, and
properly vetted election process? This time, I have no answer.
Do you? Does he? Many of us are waiting.
He had plenty of time to manufacture and execute and incredible campaign.
Outspending his opponent by estimates of up to 5 to 1, he certainly had
resources. He did find time, amidst this very quiet and clearly
extraordinarily tricky trial that the media mostly would not touch, due to
the "nut job" nature of the theories - to go to the state in
question, Hawaii, to visit his grandmother. When did he have
time to make this trip? Not only at the tail end of the election,
but coincidentally - at the tail end of the trial questioning his natural
born citizenship, in fact only a few days after he and his attorneys
watched the clock expire on the court-recognized demand by the Plaintiff
to produce the document. But alas, no time or resources to actually
hand a piece of paper over to the courts, the Board of Elections, the
Federal Elections Commission or even the Democratic National Committee.
"Well Hank, that law in the Constitution is pretty minor compared to
what Barack Obama will do for us as President." That's very,
very questionable - to anyone who truly understands the nature of
capitalism and/or national security. Actually, that's an unfair
statement. I would say, in the opinions of many, many Americans -
that's very questionable to those who believe they, or Senator
Obama's opponent, better understand the nature of capitalism and/or
national security, than does Senator Obama. So let's not ignore the
Constitution entirely, just because potentially a little more than half of
the voters believe he's the man for the job. Afterall, I may very
well be considered able-minded to more responsibly and effectively spend
$100,000.00 better than a bank or it's customers....but this doesn't give
me the authority to go in and steal it.
Obama has not yet properly disclosed the one document that would remove
all doubt, and properly vet him for the position he has pursued, by way of
the trust of the American
people and the millions and millions of dollars of contributions
they have handed over to him, and his effort. He simply, has not yet
done this.
He has given a less credible document to a website enabled and hosted by a
foundation Barack Obama worked under, to provide advocacy on the issue.
But that document authenticates the claim the same way hearsay
ineffectively would support a defendant's testimony. It is still,
one removed from the actual truth. No. In fact it's even less
credible than that. The fact is, the contention of Philip Berg is
that Barack Obama was actually born in Kenya,
per a hospital record that allegedly exists there for Barack Hussein Obama
II, as well as his paternal grandmothers proud citations of having been in
the delivery room in Kenya when he was born. The document Senator
Obama provided the website, per the Hawaii
Department of Health, could be attained by someone who was not born
in the United States. It's effectively moot. This is the
Presidency of the United States of America. This is a matter of
upholding a basic fundamental of the United States Constitution.
These are bases of significant stature. I have seen many people get
many passes, but this simply cannot be one of them. Whatever may or
may not be done in the next 4-8 years, is entirely insignificant relative
to what will happen to our process, and the indiscretion "We the
people" allow to occur by affording someone the ability to cheat the
American people on his way to the most powerful position on the entire
planet.
He may not have known Bill Ayers was an unrepentant domestic terrorist
when he sat in his living room and arguably launched his political career.
He may have been 8 years old when Ayers committed these acts, but at 40
years old....he may not have heard him repeatedly declare that he was not
remorseful for his terrorist behavior. It may have been coincidental
that Ayers and Obama both gave interviews within a week of each other in
September of 2001, where they each discussed the importance of the
redistribution of wealth. He might really have slept through 20
years of Jeremiah Wright's sermons, never once hearing the race-filled propaganda
and anti-American sentiments we all eventually caught wind of.
Perhaps it slipped his mind when he claimed to have no ties to ACORN, that
he led training sessions for them....or contributed over $800,000.00 to
their umbrella for the 2008 election season. Maybe that's all true.
What part of "natural born citizenship" escaped him though?
This one, I have to hear. And if it's an illegitimate question, then
I would plead with Senator Obama to retain all the money he's expending
fighting the multiple cases that have popped up across the country, once
and for all provide proof of his natural born citizenship by way of an
actual birth certificate, and....I don't know, maybe give what he would
have spent on the trials to the middle class he is so concerned about.
Hank Rand
Lakewood, Ohio
|
|
|
***a real concern given Obama’s not insignificant
relationship with Terrorist Ayres and Obama’s recent extended visit with the
Communist relationships who violently overtook (his homeland ?) Kenya. |
|
